Bronco vs. Blazer - Ford Bronco Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 02:58 PM Thread Starter
I did done broke it
 
InsanePyro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oconomowoc, WI
Posts: 2,070
Bronco Info: 1993 F150 5.8L 2WD a.k.a RaceTruck
Bronco vs. Blazer

Came across this on YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74ulUvSssXU

I'll leave you decide if Chevy or Ford made the video


For the record I love both trucks but this video is just terrible...

Surviving is winning. Everything else is bullshit. Whatever it takes, kid. Survive.

Center your signatures you goddamn Neanderthals
InsanePyro is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 03:17 PM
USAF C-17 Avionics
 
adrianspeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dover AFB DE / Harrisburg PA
Posts: 6,685
Bronco Info: '94, '92, '88, and '84 Broncos
Blazer wins with a solid front axle, but for sure isn't more aerodynamic and I don't even get 20mpg with the diesel.

Adrianspeeder

adrianspeeder is offline  
post #3 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 04:38 PM
Big Six
 
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,867
Bronco Info: 1981 300ci 6cyl w/4bbl conversion. 4spd NP-435 manual. 32" tires.
Haha, wow. Yeah, it's easy to see who put that video together.

The Blazer more aerodynamic than a Bronco? It was designed with a cardboard box as inspiration. The Bronco at least has some styling and slanted lines in it (which, not to mention, simply makes it a nicer, more timeless looking vehicle in my opinion).

The comparisons between the six cylinders cracked me up. 16/20 vs. 16/21. Yeah, the 16/20 is almost an entire liter bigger and about 40 - 50 more torque, but I guess you gotta win arguments where you can. And maybe their six cylinder isn't meant for hard work and off-roading... Lol.

I will give them, though, that the OD transmission definitely was not meant for much more than the interstate.


I got a laugh out of how he talked the Bronco down for only being offered in 4WD.


However, is the info about the different GVW true? 1000lbs is a pretty hefty claim.
I was always under the impression Blazer frames and suspensions were lighter and weaker.
And didn't they both have NP-208s? I can definitely shift my Bronco from 2H to 4H while moving.


March 2016 FOTM
1981 Bronco. 300 I6. 450cfm QuickFuel 4bbl. BFG A/T KO2 32x11.5" tires. NP-435 trans. EFI exhaust manifolds. 2.5" Exhaust. DUI performance ignition. Redhead steering box.
Supermotors Pics
AbandonedBronco is offline  
post #4 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 05:45 PM
~*~*~*~*~*~*~
 
sackman9975's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The "D"
Posts: 8,467
Bronco Info: 1995 XLT 5.8 with 88k miles, WARN Premium Hubs
Garage
The engine bogged down going up the hill......whoever was driving the Bronco was inexperience is climbing hills. That hill wasn't chit.
sackman9975 is offline  
post #5 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 05:48 PM
Local # 40 Boilermakers
 
BRONCONUT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hartford, KY
Posts: 15,737
Bronco Info: transforming...
I find it funny they compared the chevy 5.0 to the ford 4.9 and not the 5.0. I was also waiting on that guy to morph in to a leprichan.

UNION PRIDE
MY STUPIDMOTORS
BRONCONUT is offline  
post #6 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 05:54 PM Thread Starter
I did done broke it
 
InsanePyro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oconomowoc, WI
Posts: 2,070
Bronco Info: 1993 F150 5.8L 2WD a.k.a RaceTruck
Quote:
Originally Posted by sackman9975 View Post
The engine bogged down going up the hill......whoever was driving the Bronco was inexperience is climbing hills. That hill wasn't chit.
It also didn't appear to be in 4WD. And maybe the '81 Bronco couldn't do on the move 4WD shift in? Idk I know my '89 can but its a moot point with the hubs...which don't matter to me because if I think I am gonna need 4WD its gonna be engaged long before I do.

But yes they're both modeled after cardboard boxes

Bonus Content!


Sadly the Blazer is rusting to hell...body panels are nice but the underbody is terrible...dunno why my grandpa insists on storing it in his damp as the everglades lower barn but the thing would be better off sitting outside

Surviving is winning. Everything else is bullshit. Whatever it takes, kid. Survive.

Center your signatures you goddamn Neanderthals
InsanePyro is offline  
post #7 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 08:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Canal Winchester, Ohio
Posts: 320
Bronco Info: 300 I6, 79 bronco Frame 84 F150 cab
The only thing that Chevy did better was the crank rear window. The IFS is a pain on our ass but for the "normal consumer" would never think twice about it on the freeway.
I6 Bronco is offline  
post #8 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 08:31 PM
rolling Rolling ROLLING....
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: sol cal (west covina)
Posts: 22,666
Bronco Info: 93 Cherokee
Like this has never been discussed before....

Tim

Newest token Jeep owner....

Redwagon is offline  
post #9 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 09:34 PM
Registered User
 
jasoncarpenter1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 2,808
Bronco Info: 94 bronco, why kill it if you can't over kill it
i see your chevy and raise you a dodge.............

Msd5ltrMd3Y

west coast bronco mafia
there is a 100 ways to build a bronco this is mine
fuel injected 460 c6 leaf spring dana 60 kingpin powerloc front, sterling 10.25 detroit rear 5.13 gears 42" IROK's...Build it ,Break it, Fix it..........
I HOPE F.O.T.M./Y. FAILS
jasoncarpenter1 is offline  
post #10 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 09:35 PM
F.O.T.M. - MAY 2014!!!
 
fartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 6,266
Bronco Info: 88 FSB. 4.9l -T18-BW1356-33" MTs-Warn hubs Daystar leveling kit
Quote:
Originally Posted by I6 Bronco View Post
The only thing that Chevy did better was the crank rear window. The IFS is a pain on our ass but for the "normal consumer" would never think twice about it on the freeway.
Normal consumer could not roll the Blazer rear window down driving on the freeway. Bottom line is, Broncos look better.

Sliding rear windows, GT roll bar, Cargo net and looking for other rare options. 4.10 gears LSD 33" MTs First ever Stock Fullsize of the Month...
J A S N http://www.supermotors.net/registry/19528
fartman is offline  
post #11 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 09:48 PM Thread Starter
I did done broke it
 
InsanePyro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oconomowoc, WI
Posts: 2,070
Bronco Info: 1993 F150 5.8L 2WD a.k.a RaceTruck
Quote:
Originally Posted by fartman View Post
Normal consumer could not roll the Blazer rear window down driving on the freeway. Bottom line is, Broncos look better.
Really? next time I'm by my grandpa's I'll have to check that out...could of sworn it was a switch just as the Bronco

Surviving is winning. Everything else is bullshit. Whatever it takes, kid. Survive.

Center your signatures you goddamn Neanderthals
InsanePyro is offline  
post #12 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 09:56 PM
Mud God - R.I.P.
 
Rockford514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Amelia Island Florida
Posts: 5,919
Bronco Info: 66,79,79,87
I want me some blazer

Buddy
Better To Be An Open Sinner Than A False Saint
Rockford514 is offline  
post #13 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-11-2012, 10:36 PM
I did all for the Nookie
 
huggyb1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indiana The Middle
Posts: 7,189
Bronco Info: 89' Bronco 5.8l Variable Speed V8, Forward, Rev, Turns left, right, stops, and everything.
Garage
1. Any of us trail riders all know the hill never looks as bad in video/pictures as it feels in the drivers seat.
2. Everybody I mean Everybody who takes a 4x4 offroad seriously takes those auto locking hubs and throws them in the trash can where they belong and gets a set of Warns or comparable.
3. What is a 4.1l chevy a V6 or a I6? put it nose to nose with a 4.9 and I guarantee the Bowtie is considered less than capable all around.
4. How many of those ESC engines are still running as designed I bet there are twice as many Durasparks out there running still as built.


351W, ZF5-47, BW1356, 10.25/D60
FOTM DEC. 2011
"Quando Omni Flunkus, Moritati,"
When all else fails roll over and play dead.

Last edited by huggyb1972; 12-11-2012 at 10:38 PM.
huggyb1972 is offline  
post #14 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-12-2012, 09:34 AM
Moderator
 
miesk5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 15,512
Bronco Info: 96 XL 5.0 E4OD, Man Xfer/Hubs
Garage
yo,
Ck out
1979 Bronco vs. Blazer
Source: by Indybronco (Lula Mae) at http://www.supermotors.net/clubs/sup...try/1964/33114






96 XL 5.0 E4OD, Man Xfer/Hubs
USN & DoD Planner (ret)
THANKS to ALL WHO SERVE!

my broncolinks.com was "disturbed"; but some sections are archived @ [url]http://web.archive.org/web/20121009110424/http://www.broncolinks.com/index.php
select a LINK, Right Click & Hit Properties; copy the second HTTP address; paste in a new browser window or Tab to see original page


miesk5 is offline  
post #15 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-12-2012, 09:52 AM
Big Six
 
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,867
Bronco Info: 1981 300ci 6cyl w/4bbl conversion. 4spd NP-435 manual. 32" tires.
Quote:
Originally Posted by huggyb1972 View Post
1. Any of us trail riders all know the hill never looks as bad in video/pictures as it feels in the drivers seat.
Isn't that the truth? I'm on some crazy steep hill where I have my hands on the dashboard, and someone takes a picture, and from the outside it looks like I'm playing in the sandbox.

Quote:
2. Everybody I mean Everybody who takes a 4x4 offroad seriously takes those auto locking hubs and throws them in the trash can where they belong and gets a set of Warns or comparable.
Not only that, but I was pretty sure that auto locking hubs were standard on an '81. As far as I'm aware, this was a completely false claim by Chevy in the video, since both had autos standard, and turnable hubs optional. But very true, I'm glad whoever owned my Bronco before me put on Warns.

Quote:
3. What is a 4.1l chevy a V6 or a I6? put it nose to nose with a 4.9 and I guarantee the Bowtie is considered less than capable all around.
This is what wikipedia states under the Blazer. The 4.1 (250ci) is their smaller I6, much like Ford's 240 I6 (exact same engine as the 300 but with a 3.18" stroke instead of 3.98". Discontinued in '77)

'73 - '78
HP: 105 TQ: 185

'79 - '84
HP: 130 TQ: 210

A little more horsepower but WAY less torque. One thing Chevy did right with their straight six is put a 2bbl carb on it from the factory, something the 300 desperately needed Ford to do.

They didn't offer their 292 I6 in the Blazer.

Quote:
4. How many of those ESC engines are still running as designed I bet there are twice as many Durasparks out there running still as built.
For every 80's Blazer I see on the road, I see 10 Broncos. Easily.


March 2016 FOTM
1981 Bronco. 300 I6. 450cfm QuickFuel 4bbl. BFG A/T KO2 32x11.5" tires. NP-435 trans. EFI exhaust manifolds. 2.5" Exhaust. DUI performance ignition. Redhead steering box.
Supermotors Pics
AbandonedBronco is offline  
post #16 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-12-2012, 12:03 PM
USAF C-17 Avionics
 
adrianspeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dover AFB DE / Harrisburg PA
Posts: 6,685
Bronco Info: '94, '92, '88, and '84 Broncos
Quote:
Originally Posted by AbandonedBronco View Post
Not only that, but I was pretty sure that auto locking hubs were standard on an '81.
Auto hubs was a window stickered option on my '84 Lariat.

Adrianspeeder

adrianspeeder is offline  
post #17 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-12-2012, 12:03 PM
Fullsize Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Collin county, TX
Posts: 3,677
Bronco Info: Brick Nose on 15x10s/32s with leveling coils
before fuel injection the carbed 350 was something to brag about. Then ford came out with fuel injection on the truck in 85 and blew GM to shame. Even into the obd2 time GM still had shitty fuel injection.
GetBent4x4 is offline  
post #18 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-12-2012, 12:44 PM
Big Six
 
AbandonedBronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,867
Bronco Info: 1981 300ci 6cyl w/4bbl conversion. 4spd NP-435 manual. 32" tires.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrianspeeder View Post
Auto hubs was a window stickered option on my '84 Lariat.

Adrianspeeder
http://oldcarbrochures.org/index.php...Ford-Bronco-06

Yep, looks like it's true. Optional.


March 2016 FOTM
1981 Bronco. 300 I6. 450cfm QuickFuel 4bbl. BFG A/T KO2 32x11.5" tires. NP-435 trans. EFI exhaust manifolds. 2.5" Exhaust. DUI performance ignition. Redhead steering box.
Supermotors Pics
AbandonedBronco is offline  
post #19 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-12-2012, 01:24 PM
Retired
 
79F150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Dallas Ga
Posts: 16,755
Bronco Info: 2016 Road Glide Ultra
I had a good chuckle at the video. Funny part was the chevy 305 is garbage and snatched many out to replace with a 350 but that is a no brainer.

One thing they did good with the Blazer was keep a straight axle and later years with fuel injected 350's not to mention a bolt in swap to one ton axles. They had there advantages but still don't change the fact that I like Ford better.
79F150 is offline  
post #20 of 69 (permalink) Old 12-12-2012, 02:07 PM
Retired Staff
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Spring Grove, Illinois
Posts: 12,499
Bronco Info: 79 Bronco, 47 Binder
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79F150 View Post
I had a good chuckle at the video. Funny part was the chevy 305 is garbage and snatched many out to replace with a 350 but that is a no brainer.
305's were very popular for eating camshafts.
Ranger429 is offline  
Reply

  Ford Bronco Forum > Other Forums > General Discussion/ Bronco and Wheeling related.

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Bronco Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself. DO NOT USE Gmail.com accounts. If you only have a Gmail.com email please contact the administrator here

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome