View Full Version : Why Democratic Senator Zell Miller skipped the Convention


Iolaus
08-02-2004, 02:40 AM
From the Democratic senator from Georgia, Zell Miller.

See Y'All in New York
Why I skipped the Boston convention.

BY ZELL MILLER
Saturday, July 31, 2004 12:01 a.m.

Twelve years ago, I delivered one of the keynote addresses on the first night at the Democratic National Convention in New York. It was a stinging rebuke of the administration of George H.W. Bush and a ringing endorsement of Bill Clinton. This summer I'll again be speaking in New York, but it will be to the Republican Convention that renominates George W. Bush.

Many have asked how I could have come so far in just over a decade. Frankly, I don't think I've changed much at all. At 72, I don't feel much need to change my opinions. Instead, the reason I didn't attend the Democratic Convention in Boston is that I barely recognize my party anymore. Most of its leaders--including our nominee, John Kerry--don't hold the same beliefs that have motivated my career in public service.

In 1992, I spoke of the opportunity and hope that allowed me, the son of a single mother growing up in the North Georgia mountains, to become my state's governor. And I attributed much of my success to the great Democratic presidents of years gone by--FDR (a hallowed man in my home), Truman and JFK. The link these men shared was a commitment to helping Americans born into any condition rise to achieve whatever goal they set for themselves.

I spoke of Americans who were "tired of paying more in taxes and getting less in services." I excoriated Republicans who "dealt in cynicism and skepticism." I accused them of mastering "the art of division and diversion." And I praised Bill Clinton as a moderate Democrat "who has the courage to tell some of those liberals who think welfare should continue forever, and some of those conservatives who think there should be no welfare at all, that they're both wrong."

Bill Clinton did deliver on welfare reform, after a lot of prodding from the Republicans who took hold of Congress in 1995. But much of the rest of the promise I saw in his candidacy withered during his two terms in office.

Today, it's the Democratic Party that has mastered the art of division and diversion. To run for president as a Democrat these days you have to go from interest group to interest group, cap in hand, asking for the support of liberal kingmakers. Mr. Kerry is no different. After Hollywood elites profaned the president, he didn't have the courage to put them in their place. Instead, he validated their remarks, claiming that they represent "the heart and soul of America."

No longer the party of hope, today's Democratic Party has become Mr. Kerry's many mansions of cynicism and skepticism. As our economy continues to get better and businesses add jobs, Mr. Kerry's going around America trying to convince people that the roof is about to cave in. He talks about "the misery index" and the Depression. What does he know about either?

And when it comes to taxes and services, you'd be pressed to find anyone more opposed to the interests of middle-class Americans than John Kerry. Except maybe John Edwards. Both voted against tax relief for married couples, tax relief for families with children, and tax relief for small businesses. Now Mr. Kerry wants to raise taxes on hundreds of thousands of small-business owners and millions of individuals. He claims to be for working people, but I don't understand how small businesses can create jobs if they've got to send more money to Washington instead of keeping it to hire workers.

Worst of all, Sens. Kerry and Edwards have not kept faith with the men and women who are fighting the war on terror--most of whom come from small towns and middle-class families all over America. While Mr. Bush has stood by our troops every step of the way, Messrs. Kerry and Edwards voted to send our troops to war and then voted against the money to give them supplies and equipment--not to mention better benefits for their families. And recently Mr. Kerry even said he's proud of that vote. Proud to abandon our troops when they're out in the field? I can hear Harry Truman cussing from his grave.

I still believe in hope and opportunity and, when it comes right down to it, Mr. Bush is the man who represents hope and opportunity. Hope for a safer world. And opportunity for Americans to work hard, keep more of the money they earn, and send their kids to good schools. All the speeches we heard this week weren't able to hide the truth of what today's Democratic Party has become: an enclave of elites paying lip service to middle-class values. Americans looking for a president who understands their struggles and their dreams should tune in next month, when we celebrate the leadership of George W. Bush.

Mr. Miller is a Democratic senator from Georgia.

spence007
08-02-2004, 12:00 PM
Makes me want to go out and buy " A National Party No More"

marv
08-02-2004, 01:31 PM
I can't wait to hear Zell's address at the Republican convention.

Ronald Reagan was asked why he left the Democratic party. He said, "I didn't leave the Democratic party, it left me!"

Iolaus
08-02-2004, 02:08 PM
Tim Russert interviewed him yesterday

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5574180/

Here's a short excerpt:

MR. RUSSERT: It's interesting, because your views of Senator Kerry seemed to have changed. This is what you said of March of this year. "...after hearing the agenda [Kerry has] laid out for our country-I cannot support him in his race for the presidency. There are too many issues about which John Kerry and I disagree. And there are too few similarities between John Kerry and the great Democratic leaders I've known."

But here you are just three short years ago, with Senator Kerry, in Atlanta, Georgia. There's a picture of the two of you, and that night you said this. "My job tonight is an easy one: to present to you one of this nation's authentic heroes, one of this party's best known and greatest leaders-and a good friend. ...In his 16 years in the Senator John Kerry has fought against government waste and worked hard to bring some accountability to Washington. Early in his Senate career in 1986, John signed on to the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Reduction Bill, and he fought for balanced budgets before it was considered politically correct for Democrats to do so. John has worked to strengthen our military, reform public education, boost the economy and protect the environment."

That's not ancient history. That's 2001.

SEN. MILLER: That's also the press release they gave me to introduce him by. And I was very impressed with John Kerry when I first came to the Senate, because I knew this man was an authentic American hero. And anyone that has a Silver Star and Bronze Star and three Purple Hearts, I respect and admire and thank them for their service. But later I got to serve with this served with this man and I saw what kind of record he really did have in the Senate.

But let's make one thing clear, Tim. I am not for President Bush's re-election because I am against John Kerry. I am for President George W. Bush because he is the right man in the right place at the right time. He is the man who has had the backbone to stand up and defend America in possibly the worst time in all of our history. That's why I'm for him, because he's a strong leader. He understood that the best way to keep money back with people is to leave the money in their pockets and never take it to Washington in the first place. I'm for George W. Bush because of positive reasons, not negative reasons against John Kerry.

spence007
08-02-2004, 03:13 PM
I'm for George W. Bush because of positive reasons, not negative reasons against John Kerry.[/QUOTE]

Its funny how people say "anyone but George Bush" so no matter how bad the Democratic candidates voting record is and no matter how high he will raise taxes he gets their vote. Zell expresses real feelings about who he would rather have as president, things would be much better in our country if Democrats and Republicans alike would vote their conscience instead of what their party wants.

oregonbronco
08-04-2004, 04:46 PM
I bought his book, good read

I dont blame him, the democrat party has gone verrry far left

oregonbronco
08-04-2004, 04:47 PM
I'm for George W. Bush because of positive reasons, not negative reasons against John Kerry.

Its funny how people say "anyone but George Bush" so no matter how bad the Democratic candidates voting record is and no matter how high he will raise taxes he gets their vote. Zell expresses real feelings about who he would rather have as president, things would be much better in our country if Democrats and Republicans alike would vote their conscience instead of what their party wants.[/QUOTE]


lol I actaully jsut ordered another sticker its...

10 out of 10 terrorsits agree anybody but Bush

spence007
08-04-2004, 05:13 PM
Its funny how people say "anyone but George Bush" so no matter how bad the Democratic candidates voting record is and no matter how high he will raise taxes he gets their vote. Zell expresses real feelings about who he would rather have as president, things would be much better in our country if Democrats and Republicans alike would vote their conscience instead of what their party wants.


lol I actaully jsut ordered another sticker its...

10 out of 10 terrorsits agree anybody but Bush[/QUOTE]

Where did you get them?

Froggmann
08-05-2004, 06:48 AM
I dont blame him, the democrat party has gone verrry far left

Well at least they havent gone as far left as these nutballs we have here in Comunifornia. Hell, these idiots believe Illegal aliens have say in what goes on in our country!


Ahhh hell, thats for another "discussion" :banghead :uke:

Iolaus
08-05-2004, 11:13 AM
Well at least they havent gone as far left as these nutballs we have here in Comunifornia. Hell, these idiots believe Illegal aliens have say in what goes on in our country!


Ahhh hell, thats for another "discussion" :banghead :uke:...and they were talking about giving kids under 18 the right to cast ½ & ¼ votes! :wacko