400M rollerized - FSB Forums
Register Home Forums Active Topics Photo Gallery All Albums Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowInsurance FSB Store
FullsizeBronco.com is the premier Ford Bronco Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
View Poll Results: Roller cam or not
Shell it out and upgrade to roller cam 21 60.00%
Leave it alone and drive it! 14 40.00%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2013, 05:11 PM   #1
Shaker666
Registered User
 
Shaker666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ, but I'm a Canuck.
Posts: 297
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: '79 Bronco Ranger XLT, lifted, locked, injected
400M rollerized

I was toying with the idea of upgrading my 400M build with a roller cam, but really can't justify the cost. The simulator does show a significant increase in low end torque however and improving the efficiency of the truck has always been a priority. I'm currently running a Crane 523902 hydraulic flat tappet. Runs great. I've been looking at the Crane 529541 hydraulic roller. Not really sure whether it's really worth $1200 in parts and the time. Thoughts? Can't attach images, so here's a table showing the differences:

Current flat tappet sim data:
RPM Power Torque
2000 157 411
2500 205 430
3000 253 443
3500 302 453
4000 333 438
4500 349 407
5000 337 354

Roller cam upgrade sim data:
RPM Power Torque
2000 178 468
2500 228 479
3000 281 492
3500 330 495
4000 358 469
4500 364 426
5000 348 366
__________________
'79 Ford Bronco: 408M-C6-NP205 SEFI-EDIS8; 4" lift, Dana 44/Ford 9" w/4.10s, locked
'89 5.0L LX hatch: full 90mm Blowzilla blown Dart 304 w/Vic Jr heads + TMoss ported GT40 lower @ 8.4:1
'71 Mach 1: short deck girdled 408W w/stage 1 RHS 215 heads + Vic 5.8 EFI intake @ 10.3:1
Shaker666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-09-2013, 06:29 PM   #2
351w500
Ok, Ill admit it's Vagish
 
351w500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fairfield ca.
Posts: 10,044
iTrader: (4)
Bronco Info: '90 xlt 351w E40D Truetrac I GOT ROLLER ROCKERS !
Are your heads gonna flow what a roller cam profile will want to throw at them ? I would LOVE to see a roller cammed 400, that would be so badazz-
351w500 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 06:55 PM   #3
Shaker666
Registered User
 
Shaker666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ, but I'm a Canuck.
Posts: 297
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: '79 Bronco Ranger XLT, lifted, locked, injected
Quote:
Originally Posted by 351w500 View Post
Are your heads gonna flow what a roller cam profile will want to throw at them ? I would LOVE to see a roller cammed 400, that would be so badazz-
The heads are the stock open chamber 2V Cleveland heads that came on the 400M. They're certainly canted valves, I think they flow pretty well right from the factory. The valves are 2.04" intake and 1.67" exhaust. I am basically looking for improved fuel economy and low end torque.
Shaker666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:54 PM   #4
harleytech
Registered User
 
harleytech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Palatka
Posts: 1,599
iTrader: (2)
Bronco Info: 77 F250, 79 Bronco, 95, Bronco, 96 Bronco, 13 HD Dyna
Id love to see a roller 400 but that is a bit of money ...then again it might be well worth it! Go for it!
__________________
Can one ever have enough Fords? I think not!
harleytech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 10:04 PM   #5
raleigh
Fullsize Member
 
raleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Viva Las Vegas
Posts: 2,145
iTrader: (3)
Bronco Info: 1 1978 and 2 1979 Broncos mishmashed together into one
It would be unique for sure, if I had the money I would do it to mine, those are decent gains and MPG would be a significant gain as well.
__________________
Dave
FOTM is BACK!

FB Build page

"...when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
raleigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 10:11 PM   #6
351w500
Ok, Ill admit it's Vagish
 
351w500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fairfield ca.
Posts: 10,044
iTrader: (4)
Bronco Info: '90 xlt 351w E40D Truetrac I GOT ROLLER ROCKERS !
If you can get actual 2v 351 cleveland heads they will flow better than the later 2v M/400 heads because of the non-restricted exhaust runner-
351w500 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 02:48 PM   #7
OX1
Fullsize Member
 
OX1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: central jersey
Posts: 2,896
iTrader: (7)
I'd talk with Tim Meyer and see if those gains are true, especially the low end torque from only a roller cam.

This is chebbie, but they don't seem to show much low end increase at all.

http://www.superchevy.com/technical/.../photo_13.html

For that kind of cabbage, I'd go Aussie heads.

And I don't believe either is going to affect mileage enough to matter.
__________________
79 XLT, 400/C6/mog 404's/42 IROKS, 8.5" lift.
79 XLT, 400/C6/D60-D44 8 lug, 2" lift, 35 BFG AT
74 Bronc build, 408/C6/Black Box/205/406 mogs/43 SX stickies

OX1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 03:32 PM   #8
outlawbob
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ga
Posts: 363
iTrader: (1)
Bronco Info: 1978 & 1990
I have a 400 roller..Just over 100 mile on it now..look for my build in the build forums..i also have aussie heads..makes a ton of torgue..
outlawbob
outlawbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 04:40 PM   #9
351w500
Ok, Ill admit it's Vagish
 
351w500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fairfield ca.
Posts: 10,044
iTrader: (4)
Bronco Info: '90 xlt 351w E40D Truetrac I GOT ROLLER ROCKERS !
i got Aussie heads on my 351c motor, They Rock ALOT {CHI 2v heads}
351w500 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 05:29 PM   #10
InfoFord
Registered User
 
InfoFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kalispell Montana
Posts: 2,251
iTrader: (5)
Bronco Info: Picador 4 door bronco EFI 460 E4OD electric shift 1356 Tcase 3.55 10.25 rear, 3.54 Dana 44 front
that is a lot of money to toss at a 335 series engine

about the only thing it will be is bragging rights that you have a roller 400
__________________
Trent
NORTH COUNTRY SPECIALTIES
Picador (1979 4door Bronco)
79 Ford CrewCab 4X4(My Dually Project)
79 Ford Bronco and My Boat
InfoFord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 05:35 PM   #11
Shaker666
Registered User
 
Shaker666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ, but I'm a Canuck.
Posts: 297
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: '79 Bronco Ranger XLT, lifted, locked, injected
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfoFord View Post
that is a lot of money to toss at a 335 series engine

about the only thing it will be is bragging rights that you have a roller 400
You got that right. Motor's already pushing over 400 ft-lbs of torque at 2000 RPM. I really don't think it's worth the effort or the cabbage.
__________________
'79 Ford Bronco: 408M-C6-NP205 SEFI-EDIS8; 4" lift, Dana 44/Ford 9" w/4.10s, locked
'89 5.0L LX hatch: full 90mm Blowzilla blown Dart 304 w/Vic Jr heads + TMoss ported GT40 lower @ 8.4:1
'71 Mach 1: short deck girdled 408W w/stage 1 RHS 215 heads + Vic 5.8 EFI intake @ 10.3:1
Shaker666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 09:19 AM   #12
CBboots
FSM Lifetime
 
CBboots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,316
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: 79 Custom, 460, C6
x2 on what InfoFord was saying....bragging rights is about it, IMO. I'm thinking your fuel injection is about the only thing that would let you see a "noticable" difference.
BTW, can I have your BKO?
__________________
My 79 build http://www.fullsizebronco.com/forum/...d.php?t=207864 - Aluminum 3-core radiator, Mallory 85 HEI conversion distributor, High Angle Driveline One Tons front and rear, JBFAB Twin stick shifter kit, True trac differentials front and rear, Yukon 4.56 gears front and rear, Moser Extreme 31 spline rear axles, Borgeson adjustable steering shaft and rag joint, 95 amp 3G alternator, Fireguy/RJM Tech upgraded headlight harness, and a ton of other crap!
CBboots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 10:12 AM   #13
harleytech
Registered User
 
harleytech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Palatka
Posts: 1,599
iTrader: (2)
Bronco Info: 77 F250, 79 Bronco, 95, Bronco, 96 Bronco, 13 HD Dyna
What Kinda fuel economy are you seeing out of your motor as it sits right now?
__________________
Can one ever have enough Fords? I think not!
harleytech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 10:26 AM   #14
Shaker666
Registered User
 
Shaker666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ, but I'm a Canuck.
Posts: 297
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: '79 Bronco Ranger XLT, lifted, locked, injected
Quote:
Originally Posted by harleytech View Post
What Kinda fuel economy are you seeing out of your motor as it sits right now?
Rolling on a set of Toyo 35x13.50x15 M/Ts with 4.11 gears I'm seeing a solid 10 mpg regardless of whether I'm on a highway or in town. I'd love to get it up to 12 mpg if it were possible, but I don't think the cam's gonna do it for me.
__________________
'79 Ford Bronco: 408M-C6-NP205 SEFI-EDIS8; 4" lift, Dana 44/Ford 9" w/4.10s, locked
'89 5.0L LX hatch: full 90mm Blowzilla blown Dart 304 w/Vic Jr heads + TMoss ported GT40 lower @ 8.4:1
'71 Mach 1: short deck girdled 408W w/stage 1 RHS 215 heads + Vic 5.8 EFI intake @ 10.3:1
Shaker666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 11:15 AM   #15
bmc69
FSM Lifetime
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: an island near Maryland
Posts: 3,956
iTrader: (5)
Bronco Info: '66-'78 bunch o' Broncos...and one Filly
I'm putting a 400 roller together for my '78. I didn't actually plan to build it..just came to the realization that my 20-years plus of collecting Ford engines and parts left me with everything I needed for a nice build except the TMeyer pistons. The ole '78 is in the midst of a 1-ton axle swap right now; the engine swap will follow.

- Aussie 2V heads, Ferrea stainless 2.07/1,6, with studs, guide plates and SVO roller rockers
- A custom 400 roller cam, NIB, that came with another project I bought. It's mostly a 290H grind that isn't far off the Comp Cams version.
- Multi-port EFI (mostly Ford parts...similar to the one Jopes did)
__________________
bmc69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 11:38 AM   #16
Shaker666
Registered User
 
Shaker666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ, but I'm a Canuck.
Posts: 297
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: '79 Bronco Ranger XLT, lifted, locked, injected
I've come to the decision that spending about $1200 on installing a roller cam in my 400 isn't worthwhile considering my future plans for the Bronco. First off, the roller cam won't actually yield much better power/torque numbers and certainly won't affect my fuel mileage appreciably. Second, I'm going to replace the engine with a Cummins 4BT at some point - 400M runs great since I injected it and fuel economy has been the only issue. 6000 lbs of truck requires a certain amount of energy to move and there's no changing that, however.
__________________
'79 Ford Bronco: 408M-C6-NP205 SEFI-EDIS8; 4" lift, Dana 44/Ford 9" w/4.10s, locked
'89 5.0L LX hatch: full 90mm Blowzilla blown Dart 304 w/Vic Jr heads + TMoss ported GT40 lower @ 8.4:1
'71 Mach 1: short deck girdled 408W w/stage 1 RHS 215 heads + Vic 5.8 EFI intake @ 10.3:1
Shaker666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 12:27 PM   #17
cheepsk8
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Rozet, Wy
Posts: 38
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: 1979 $300
Probably the best money you could spend for getting better fuel economy is to buy a small car. They get better fuel economy, easier to park, have cheaper tires, and gives you a parts runner.
__________________
cheepsk8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 01:04 PM   #18
Alvin in AZ
AKA: Butthead
 
Alvin in AZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gadsden Purchase
Posts: 2,880
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: '91 RoadQueen 351w-2wd-ZF camtiming+4* 265/75-16E's dual Ranchos F&R, SuperCab bench seat EEC=F250
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheepsk8 View Post
...easier to park...
Except for that... x2 all the rest. :)

My wife sez the Bronco "out parks" and "out turns" her '95 Tracer (Escort).

I'm thinking about "breaking" the Bronco somehow so it'll stay home long
enough for me to work on it.

Alvin in AZ
Alvin in AZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 01:16 PM   #19
Alvin in AZ
AKA: Butthead
 
Alvin in AZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Gadsden Purchase
Posts: 2,880
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: '91 RoadQueen 351w-2wd-ZF camtiming+4* 265/75-16E's dual Ranchos F&R, SuperCab bench seat EEC=F250
Money wise, what's the difference between a 400 roller and a 408w roller?

Quote:
Originally Posted by outlawbob View Post
I have a 400 roller... ...makes a ton of torque..
outlawbob
I bet it does. :)

Those 4" stroke motors have got to be cool. :)

As a kid had a '67 Doge Dart with a 225 slant six = 4+1/8" stroke.
Their 170 with its 3+1/8" stroke was an absolute dog, could hardly
get out of its own way. LOL :)

Just thought... "ton of torque" = "2000ft/lbs" LOL :)

Alvin in AZ
Alvin in AZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 04:16 PM   #20
Shaker666
Registered User
 
Shaker666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ, but I'm a Canuck.
Posts: 297
iTrader: (0)
Bronco Info: '79 Bronco Ranger XLT, lifted, locked, injected
The difference in cost between a 408M and a 408W is pretty huge. Basically, the heads on the Windsor block have to be replaced, which makes it far less affordable. Any Cleveland head is a far cry above and beyond in performance compared to a stock SBF piece. I built my 400M for less than $2K, that included new pistons, rings, valve job, bearings, cutting the crank down, ARP Wave-loc rod bolts, cam, double roller timing chain, oil pump, rockers, Glyptal, and long tube ceramic coated headers. The roller cammed 408W in my Mustang was a bit more $$$ and the heads were a sizable part of that cost.

Regarding fuel economy, I already ride a motorcycle to work everyday (50-60 mpg) and have a small 4 cylinder Jap car as well... the need to improve the fuel economy is driven by the cost of travel when going on adventures to Colorado for skiing, mountain biking, etc. in Bronco. Not my daily commute which often involves riding a mountain bike.
__________________
'79 Ford Bronco: 408M-C6-NP205 SEFI-EDIS8; 4" lift, Dana 44/Ford 9" w/4.10s, locked
'89 5.0L LX hatch: full 90mm Blowzilla blown Dart 304 w/Vic Jr heads + TMoss ported GT40 lower @ 8.4:1
'71 Mach 1: short deck girdled 408W w/stage 1 RHS 215 heads + Vic 5.8 EFI intake @ 10.3:1
Shaker666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  FSB Forums > Bronco Discussions > 1978-'79 Bronco Tech


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.


2003-2009 FullSizeBronco.com. All rights reserved