Full Size Ford Bronco Forum banner

1 - 20 of 122 Posts

·
OUT OF BUSINESS / M.I.A.
Joined
·
10,875 Posts
Discussion Starter #1

For a good fuel injection truck cam:
intake duration @ 0.50" should be kept at or under 210
Gross valve lift should be kept under 0.500
Lobe seperation should be at or above 114°

Good 5.0L/5.8L (302/351) EFI hydraulic flat tappet cams:

Comp Cam 35-255-5
* Duration at .050 in.: 210 / 214
* Gross valve lift: 0.478 / 0.485
* Lobe separation: 114°


Edelbrock 3782
* Duration at .050 in.: 210 / 216
* Gross valve lift: 0.469 / 0.484
* Lobe separation: 116°


Crane Cams 444232
* Duration at .050 in.: 206 / 214
* Gross valve lift: 0.448 / 0.464
* Lobe separation: 114°


Best 5.0L/5.8L (302/351) Roller EFI cam:
89-95 Mustang 5.0L HO
Ford Part numbers: E8ZE-6250-CA / F1ZE-6250-AA / F4ZE-6250-DA
* Advertised Duration: 276 / 266
* Duration at .050 in.: 214 / 210
* Gross valve lift: 0.444 / 0.444
* Lobe separation: 115°


Good 7.5L (460) EFI cam:
Comp Cam 34-255-5
* Duration at .050 in.: 212 / 219
* Gross valve lift: 0.490 / 0.495
* Lobe separation: 114°

-------------------------------------------------------

Stock 302
* Duration at .050 in.: 210 / 211
* Gross valve lift: 0.421 / 0.447
* Lobe separation: 116°

Stock 351
* Duration at .050 in.: 206 / 221
* Gross valve lift: 0.440 / 0.450
* Lobe separation: 115°

Lightning
* Duration at .050 in.: 198 / 208
* Gross valve lift: 0.416 / 0.445
* Lobe separation: 114°

96-01 Explorer 5.0L HO roller
Ford Part numbers: F4TE-6250-BA
* Advertised Duration: 256 / 266
* Duration at .050 in.: 186 / 197
* Gross valve lift: 0.422 / 0.448
* Lobe separation: 116°

Stock 460
* Duration at .050 in.: 193 / 206
* Gross valve lift: 0.438 / 0.459
* Lobe separation: 111°? (unsure at this time)

-------------------------------------------------------

Linkbar lifters can be used to retrofit a roller cam into an older block
 

·
Living in Obscurity
Joined
·
1,928 Posts
Re: How to pick a CAMSHAFT

Fireguy50 said:

Good 302 cam:
Comp Cams 31-255-5
* Duration at .050 in.: 206 / 212
* Gross valve lift: 0.462 / 0.474
* Lobe separation: 114

That's the cam I put in. I like it, it works well with my GT-40 heads and I still have a good idle. I recommend it!:thumbup

MM
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
98 Posts
Picking a cam should be bases on all the vechicle specs and the driveing disires of the owner. Most inportant factors when pickin a cam are compression ratio, gear ratio, weight, stall speed, head flow, and what you want to do with it.


Best thing for a novice to do is call up a cam company and get a recomendation.
 

·
Living in Obscurity
Joined
·
1,928 Posts
Tunedup said:

Best thing for a novice to do is call up a cam company and get a recomendation.

Yup, that's kinda what I did, I got a lift recommendation from a buddy helping me with the engine swap and had heard the same thing about the lobe seperation fireguy already hit on. Called Summit, and they found a good one for me. But I would recommend calling the cam place directly, they know more about their products them summit would.

MM
 

·
OUT OF BUSINESS / M.I.A.
Joined
·
10,875 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
Tunedup said:
Picking a cam should be bases on all the vechicle specs and the driveing disires of the owner. Most inportant factors when pickin a cam are compression ratio, gear ratio, weight, stall speed, head flow, and what you want to do with it.
That is so wrong! You can "desire" to go as fast as you want. But if you have the stock truck computer you are limited as to what you can do. The cams I listed above are about all you have to choose from. If you have a carb, or feel like spending $750-$3000 on programmable EFI you can pick out what ever cam you want.
Ryan
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
98 Posts
Fireguy50 said:
That is so wrong! You can "desire" to go as fast as you want. But if you have the stock truck computer you are limited as to what you can do. The cams I listed above are about all you have to choose from. If you have a carb, or feel like spending $750-$3000 on programmable EFI you can pick out what ever cam you want.
Ryan

Picking a cam with dur below 210 and ls above 114 will not get you the best performing cam for your buck. You might as well said pick up a cam catalog and pick a cam thats for a stock/mildly modified efi motor. I just pointed out that you need to consider many things when picking a cam. And unless you have years of experiance you should call up and let an "expert" help you in the right direction. Desire = how much time, effort, and money, you want to sink into it.

You go up to a guy running a professional mud drag truck and tell him he has to run a cam with [email protected] and 114lsa your gonna get laughed at.
 

·
OUT OF BUSINESS / M.I.A.
Joined
·
10,875 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
Re: How to pick a CAMSHAFT

The very first line I typed was:
Fireguy50 said:
For a good fuel injection truck cam:
I never said anything about mud drags. Anyone running fuel injection on a mud drag vehicle is too stupid to worry about picking the correct cam.

If anyone buys a higher performance cam than the above limits for a stock truck computer, they will ruin the dependability of the truck. Fuel ratios will be way off, and idle will be so bad the owner will sell the truck.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
990 Posts
Duration____________Lift_______________Lobe
Intake-Exhaust------Intake-Exhaust-------Seperation
204*__214*______.448"__.472"______112*

I have this cam in the 302 in my bronco II. I am planning on pulling that engine out and putting it in the bronco, with all the EFI stuff from the big bronco.
This cam won't work with the speed density will it, cause of the lobe separation?
 

·
OUT OF BUSINESS / M.I.A.
Joined
·
10,875 Posts
Discussion Starter #10
nope, you can try it, but...
you'll swap that cam out
AND I'll say "I told ya so"
 

·
OUT OF BUSINESS / M.I.A.
Joined
·
10,875 Posts
Discussion Starter #12
Hdpsd said:
what about a good ca emsission cam?
Not a good idea. :( I'd stick to simple improving flow if you live in CA. My reasoning is that any cam that would pass CA inspection and keep the computer happy wouldn't be much of an improvment over stock. make sence?

freak said:
You forgot to mention Crower cam's
I didn't know they made any cam's to keep Speed Desnity EFI happy. You got any links, info, ect?
 
B

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Comps Speed Density Camshaft
Same part number as Ryan mentions. I was told it was a cam that would work well with speed density. I'm running it currently.

Lobe center 114, duration 250int. 260exh. .462int. & .474exh.


Part # 31-255-5
Grind # FS XE250H-14
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
51 Posts
Fireguy50 said:
Not a good idea. :( I'd stick to simple improving flow if you live in CA. My reasoning is that any cam that would pass CA inspection and keep the computer happy wouldn't be much of an improvment over stock. make sence?
Are you saying that putting in a mild cam for a 302 WILL give you problems with CA smog testing?

I am no expert on this but why would it have problems with emissions? Would you mind explaining a bit... The cam won't/can't run the truck richer on a stock EFI right? The computer controls the mixture and stock factory settings prevent that. Before I say anymore and confuse myself I'll let you set me straight.
 

·
OUT OF BUSINESS / M.I.A.
Joined
·
10,875 Posts
Discussion Starter #15
A mild cam wouldn't necisarily make you fail an emmsions test. But why put in a mild cam without intake and exhaust mods would yeild much of an improment.

I did saying not to......
I'm saying the work and money involved in a mild cam wouldn't give much of a gain.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
51 Posts
Fireguy50 said:
A mild cam wouldn't necisarily make you fail an emmsions test. But why put in a mild cam without intake and exhaust mods would yeild much of an improment.

I did saying not to......
I'm saying the work and money involved in a mild cam wouldn't give much of a gain.
Would then the whole package (cam, intake, exhaust) make you fail CA emission testing? Are you able to make both intake and exhaust mods and still pass smog from an emissions standpoint??

And then as far as a viz inspection I think I could get away with headers and they probably wouldn't notice anything else.... Or would they.... Maybe I don't have a proper visual on what these mods would look like under the hood.... But say nothing on the outside is changed; All I ever remember "them" looking for is pipes, O2 sensor cat, muffler etc.... And there's no reason you can't put all that on and maintain performance and flow right???

And to finish the questions.... It seem like doing one mod is a slippery slope. Can't do cam with out intake, can't do intake without exhaust etc.... so is it better to do all or nothing? Or can there be a middle ground where one can build a good-solid- long running motor making the improvements Ford couldn't back when my truck was originally put together.....
 

·
OUT OF BUSINESS / M.I.A.
Joined
·
10,875 Posts
Discussion Starter #17
You can buy headers, cam and intake all with CA smog legal papers.
And in my book: intake / cam / exhaust is all a starting point. I don't consider sliding down the slope untill you change heads / displacment / compresion - ect.

Camshaft is never a starting point. The stock cam can outperform the intake and exhaust, and possible the heads. you have to look at the total package and replace the week points. Cam is far down the line in weak points
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,904 Posts
I thought about doing a cam swap in my 94 302. My books say it has a .380"/.396" lift. But I think it has a factory roller cam. Would it be a good idea to swap in a cam with higher lift that has flat tappets? Or does someone make a speed density friendly roller cam for it?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,904 Posts
Fireguy50 said:
you have a 94 5.0L with a roller cam?
Are you sure you don't have Mass Air?
Well I'm pretty sure its speed density. There is no air meter between the filter and the throtle body. I ain't 100 % sure about the roller cam though. Thats just what I have heard from everyone.
 
1 - 20 of 122 Posts
Top