Bronco Forum - Full Size Ford Bronco Forum banner

spout in--ping. spout out--no ping.

61063 Views 215 Replies 28 Participants Last post by  VaMark
Hi everyone. I bought a bronco about a month ago, and decided to complete the sixlitre upgrade today. I replaced the plugs, wires, coil, and cap (ordered the wrong rotor, so didn't replace that). After replacing those parts, I went to remove the spout connector, and discovered that it was not there. After some research, I found that the spout connector is no more than a jumper wire to allow the truck to advance/retard its timing automatically. So, with the spout out--I adjusted the timing to 13.5*. I found a piece of wire to install as a temporary spout connector, then took the truck on a test drive. While doing this, i noticed a crazy amount of pinging when the engine was loaded (foot in the pedal or climbing a hill). I retarded the timing a bit, and it still pinged. I did this a couple times and the problem never went away. Eventually, I set the timing back to 10* and the pinging did not go away. THEN, i pulled the spout connector back out and ran the truck at stock timing and it never pinged. So basically, when the truck automatically controls its timing, it pings. When it's set at 10* with no varying--no ping.

In my mind, whatever it is that tells the "computer" what it needs to do to the timing is lying. Can anybody explain that system to me?

Any suggestions? I'm an electrical troubleshooter for a living, however I'm kind of green when it comes to understanding how this this whole system works. Thanks for your help.

p.s. I wonder if the person i bought the vehicle from, had removed the spout connector to "fix" their pinging issue. just a thought.
141 - 160 of 216 Posts
2
Here's the starting circuit for a '94 Bronco from the EVTM. The Anti-theft module is in the circuit for starting the motor (in the solenoid circuit). The pencil notes are corrections I found regarding the pins on the Anti-Theft module:

http://www.supermotors.net/getfile/874093/fullsize/94-bronco-evtm--pg.-201.jpg





http://www.supermotors.net/getfile/874092/fullsize/94-bronco-evtm--pg.-202.jpg

See less See more
Thanks Mikey,
Do you have additional pages of the EVTM for a '94 online?
Pm Sent
@mkt2488 - At BroncoJoe's suggestion, I have posted some additional pages from the '94 EVTM. The ignition system and the 5.8 Engine Controls:

Hope this helps:

https://www.supermotors.net/registry/media/874098
Miesk5, BroncoJoe, Mikey350, and all you other seasoned rocket-scientists, I really appreciate your help and diligence in diagnosing this matter. I think we're getting to the end of the road for this problem, and I hope you'll help me out in my next ventures on this remarkable machine. Today, I went to O'reilly to get the new EVR solenoid, and installed it in the parking lot of the store (in the rain). After getting it installed, I got back out on the street and the pinging was just as much there as it's ever been. ENRAGED, at the fact that i had bought, yet another part that didn't solve the problem, I got back out on the highway and had it running like a scalded dog. It was pinging and bucking like a.... well, i guess like a bucking bronc. From the store to my house is about thirty miles, and I had my foot in it pretty much the whole way. I goosed it every now and then and noticed the ping was starting to "dissipate". I was trying not to give myself false hope, however I was running theories through my head as to what could be happening. By the time I got back to my house, it was still pinging like it always did. I did some checks on it; watching the EGR diaphragm, checking/tweaking my plug wire arrangement to ensure that i didn't have crossfire (i was really out of ideas). I took it back out on the highway a couple more times, then played around with some more stuff; performed some "percussive maintenance" on the EGR valve, checked some vacuum lines for leaks with some B12 Chemtool. Then I took it back out on the highway again, and noticed the ping was gone AGAIN!... I knew it was only a matter of time then. I made a U-turn in the highway and headed back towards my house... and it hasn't pinged since. That was about 10-15 miles ago. The only logic I can muster up is; the EGR valve has been not moving for who knows how long, and now that the EVR solenoid is directing it to move, it's getting some exercise. Not knowing EXACTLY how the egr functions; does that make any sense? I haven't attempted another KOER test, as of yet. However, after I drive to work and back tomorrow, I'm going to see if somehow the spout code has disappeared.

on a side note, ever since I've been playing around with the EGR system my MIL has came on a few minutes after I get on the road. However, it clears every time i turn off the key, then turn it back on. Does that make sense? Once again guys, I appreciate your expertise.


Matt :beer
See less See more
I... performed some "percussive maintenance" on the EGR valve,... Then I took it back out on the highway again, and noticed the ping was gone AGAIN!...and it hasn't pinged since. That was about 10-15 miles ago.

The only logic I can muster up is; the EGR valve has been not moving for who knows how long, and now that the EVR solenoid is directing it to move, it's getting some exercise. Not knowing EXACTLY how the egr functions; does that make any sense?

on a side note, ever since I've been playing around with the EGR system my MIL has came on a few minutes after I get on the road. However, it clears every time i turn off the key, then turn it back on. Does that make sense? Once again guys, I appreciate your expertise.


Matt :beer
I'm FAR from an expert, but that does make sense. The one thing that flies in the face of that a little bit is that the EGR worked when you applied vacuum to it twenty years ago. :rolleyes: acrually it was just a bit earlier in this thread. :)

on a side note, ever since I've been playing around with the EGR system my MIL has came on a few minutes after I get on the road. However, it clears every time i turn off the key, then turn it back on.
Sorry... I don't know what MIL stands for.

On a side note myself, I have heard that fords don't necessarily like fancy spark plugs, and that one is typically best served by using OEM motorcraft plugs in them. I wonder if this could be part of your issue, if the percussive persuasion doesn't work.

Mikey350,
thanks for posting those additional pages. :thumbsup: :)
When i applied vacuum to the EGR "twenty years ago", i just sucked on a long piece of vacuum hose. and i sucked pretty hard. from what i've felt on the vacuum line going to the EGR--it doesn't seem to be near as strong as when i sucked on the vacuum tube. So, my guess is that the "stickiness" in the EGR valve was stronger than the vacuum. I do see your point, however. I took it out for another test drive this evening, and it's still ping-free. I think i read that MIL mean's malfunction indicator lamp aka "check engine light". I might have dreamed that though. I try to use the correct nomenclature when posting on here--you guys are kinda intimidating ;) . I used motorcraft plugs.
Matt,
You have been very intuitive throughout this entire process. My hat's off to you.

The EGR system is a very "gray" area for me too, however; your explanation above, makes perfect sense to me.

MIL vs CEL Yes now that you mention it, I have also read that MIL means "malfunction indicator lamp" I guess either is technically correct, and since I am not a pro, I only readily recognise CEL. That is my short coming, not yours.

What kind of electrical troubleshooting do you do for a living?
Well, I'm pretty sure we got it this time. Tomorrow, I'm gonna bump the timing some and see what she does. As frustrating as it was to find out my "theories" ended up being incorrect, I learned a shit-ton! With hope that I wont be labeled a "tree-hugger", I actually troubleshoot wind turbines. I spend the biggest part of my day 300' up in the air. My background is in power generation.
yo Congrats!

I really am perplexed as to da absence of any EGR related Codes in the beginning of this hunt.

Guess what I saw this morning?
It was in ref to EGR Eliminator, MIL, DTC 332 & EVP/DTFE confusion! by sydude...

This is just a clue...
"The EEC-IV logic will not allow the operation of the EGR system once the EVP 33 and 34 are registered. There by, no timing advance is added by the system, since the EGR function is bypassed"

Warm Cruise
We have come to a point where we are happy with our speed and want to just cruise into the sunset. What sounds easy turns out to be one of the most in-depth strategies we use. It is assumed that we citizens spend most of our time at cruise (yeah right), so we need the lowest emissions, highest economy, and moderate power at this time. The only good thing of warm cruise is that engine conditions are stable and need the least amount of safety nets. We still have the throttle air bypass at 100% in preparation for future braking. Fuel is stabilized with the switching of the HEGO; it cycles about 10-20 times a second. To do this the fuel ratio is leaned and enriched slightly each time the HEGO switches from lean to rich. Its like a high wire act, balancing fuel for maximum economy. EGR is operational allowing more timing with less fear of detonation. EGR also lowers the amount of oxygen in the mixture by about 15%; this means we dont need as much fuel. The canister purge valve is opened to ingest fuel vapors, this allows us to cut back on fuel metering slightly more and prevents fuel vapors from escaping to the atmosphere. Timing can be advanced to increase engine temperature and counteract EGR influence upon igniting combustion gasses. Timing is used to control engine temps, hotter engines burn fuel more completely..." http://fordfuelinjection.com/?p=3

so that got me to;
"Further research shows that this is a very common problem as the sensors get old. If anyone is still running EGR and are having odd timing/bucking issues at low loads then look into this. In my case my timing would shoot up to over 40 degrees as soon as I came off idle and until my load got higher, and there was no timing table combo that would add up to that. The EMI was introducing this issue. http://www.eectuning.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15355&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=60


The EGR is used to reduce NOX emissions by recirulating exhaust gases into the intake and mixing them with the intake charge. The EGR only works when the engine is warm and at part throttle. It does not function at WOT. If you remove it you will get no performance benefit at all. You will increase your chances of getting part throttle ping. What happens is the EEC expects a certain percentage of the mixture to be inert gases, so it adds more timing to compensate. If the inert gas is not there, or worse yet, you have allowed it to let oxygen into the intake system, there is simply too much timing added by the EEC. Some people don't have a problem with ping. Others do. You will also get a CE light, but it will not go into 'limp' mode. Hope this helps.
Don http://fullsizebronco.com/forum/showthread.php?t=193312&page=8

I'll get into it further when I have more time.
Sleep is not an option right now...lol
See less See more
I don't want to "re-nig" on the EGR finding, cuz it DEFINITELY DEFINITELY DEFINITELY, rectified my INITIAL symptom "spout in--ping, spout out--no ping". However, there's still issues. there's still a "remnant" of ping there, and now I have miss. Instead of having a nice smooth acceleration on take-off, I now have a Bleh bleh bleh, stumble stumble, bleh, stumble... I switched back to my stock coil last week, to verify that my new coil wasn't causing the problem--so, maybe my stock coil isn't powerful enough to bridge the wider gaps (almost .060), all the time. this weekend sometime, I'll switch back to my hipo coil and drop a new air filter in it. I'm also gonna remove the EGR valve and spray it with some B-12 and exercise the crap out of it.

I'll let you know what i find. thanks Miesk5 for all the research. I almost think you're spending as much time as me on this biyattch.
also, I've come to the realization that I shouldn't be angry at myself for swapping out these old parts for new ones--most of them are 17 years old. AND there's a legitimate reason, troubleshooting-wise, that i/we got there in the first place.
yo,

MY Comcast is running too slow to try and go back to your latest Pin-Point Tests, but if I recall correct, you have 10. somethAng Volts instead of 12/14 somewhere?

Think of a slightly discharged battery.. test it
and then if batty is ok,then must reace for bad connections/connectors/terminals and/or corrosion of wire strands inside terminals
miesk5,

I think this is what you are referring to.
B9 CHECK VPWR CIRCUIT VOLTAGE


Key off.
Breakout box installed, PCM connected.
Install EEC power relay.
Key on, engine off.
Measure voltage between Test Pin 37/57 and
Test Pins 40/60, 46 at breakout box.

Is voltage greater than 10.5 volts?

37 to 40 =12.33
37 to 60 =12.35
37 to 46 =12.17
57 to 40 =12.32
57 to 60 =12.34
57 to 46 =12.31

Yes
SERVICE open or short to ground in VPWR circuit between PCM and EEC power relay.
REMOVE breakout box.
RECONNECT PCM.
RERUN «Quick Test».
is there supposed to be a resistor there, that isn't working?
a resistor? that would make sense why the TSB is indicating that I should have less than battery voltage there.
yo,

Use MIKEY's Diagram to check for "SERVICE open or short to ground in VPWR circuit between PCM and EEC power relay."

See less See more
*update*

for some reason, this wasn't found in the TSB that miesk5 posted--nor the "pull test" i did on the wires. However the stars aligned, and as i was reading my timing i watched the computer advance the timing--then watched it drop back to "base" timing (10*). My father in law was helping me and I yelled "QUICK, start touching stuff (meaning for him to start moving stuff around). He bounced the EEC around a bit, and I saw it happen again. So, I went over to the EEC and started pushing and pulling and working wires around in circles to to try to find the intermittent connection again. Amazingly, i found the SIG RTN wire was dropping its connection every once in a while, causing stuff to go nuts. So, I pulled the harness off and went to the corresponding pin (46), and crimped it together a bit tighter than it was. After that, I put it back together and tried my damnedest to get it to happen again and it never did. Also, I've had the absence of a particular code 213--ever since. There's a faint ping SOMETIMES, still. Also, I'm pretty sure that my engine stumble is being caused by cylinders 3 & 4 misfiring intermittently. To find my misfiring cylinder(s), I took my timing light and put it on my passenger side bank starting at number 1. I watched the light blink and off to a steady pattern on cylinder 1 and 2. Then when i got to 3 i saw it stay off every so often. So, i pulled the plug wire off (pulled the end off of it as well), then pulled the plug and noticed it to be very black. I'm not that good at reading plugs but i think that means unburned fuel (?). Absently-mindedly, I decided to pull plug #4 as well to compare it to (keep in mind i didn't use the timing light on this cylinder. :duh ). #4 looked to be "normal" it was a light whitish (i jacked up the plug wire on that one as well). SO, i swapped the plugs between 3 & 4, "repaired" the plug wires temporarily til i can get some new ones (and a plug wire puller), and put it all back together. Now, 3 & 4 are both misfiring. Silly part is, idk if #4 was misfiring to begin with, due to the fact that I didn't check it in the beginning. I pretty much effed myself on that experiment. Regardless, the code is gone. The ping is less prominent. Progress was made. :rockon

After I get some replies on this post (since i don't wanna take up a whole page), I'll put up some more questions I have about misfire and adjacent cylinders.
See less See more
Good deal glad to hear it sometimes the wiggle test finds the problem.
I think the problem with my wiggle test before, was that I was looking at my flukemeter while doing my wiggle tests. The problem was much easier to notice when i did the wiggle test with the engine running. The engine was all over the place.
I think the problem with my wiggle test before, was that I was looking at my flukemeter while doing my wiggle tests. The problem was much easier to notice when i did the wiggle test with the engine running. The engine was all over the place.
That's a good tip! :)
141 - 160 of 216 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top