Bronco Forum - Full Size Ford Bronco Forum banner

PCV catch can

1 reading
15K views 49 replies 21 participants last post by  TheWolf  
#1 ·
Hey guys,

I picked up a PCV catch can to install along with my new engine, and I just wanted to ask: is it worth it to actually have one? I’m just starting to doubt whether I want to install it or not.

Thoughts?
 
#2 ·
hi @MS88Bronc
I was looking at one of these for a while too. What I tried instead was to move the PCV higher up the hose from the valve cover to the intake manifold.

I installed this elbow in the valve cover

installed a few inches of hose from the elbow to the bottom of the PCV valve.

then i connected the top of the PCV to a vacuum port on the intake manifold.

the hose between the elbow and bottom of the PCV acts somewhat like a catch can that allows the oil to drip back down to the valve cover. worked for me
 
#4 ·
Yo MS88Bronc,
Crankcase Breather Jar pic in an 85; "...splice into the line between the PCV and the intake. in between add a jar with 2 holes on top. one is an inlet and the other is an outlet. on the inlet side add a tube with a screen on the end which will trap the oily fumes from the air. so now u have fresh air going into the intake..."
180172

by Chris85xlt (Chris C (Erika)) @ 1985 Ford Bronco Random Pics 2 picture | SuperMotors.net

Your PCV should be next to the passenger side valve cover ...
180170


Vacuum Supply Hose Rerouting in 85-97 Bronco, F Series & vans; Failure of the #8 piston or the #8 rod or rod bearing with 5.0L and 5.8L engines. Failure of the rear piston, rod, or rod bearing (cylinders 5 & 8). After discussing the situation with several installers, the problem has been narrowed down to the PCV system. This picks up crankcase gasses from above the #8 cylinder and dumps into the back of the intake. Miesk5 NOTE; I Don't know where Ryan got the year range and #5 cylinder info from.. most likely is a typo....read more...
Source: by Ryan M (Fireguy50)
Vacuum Supply Hose Rerouting in 87-93 Bronco, F Series & vans; Failure of the #8 piston or the #8 rod or rod bearing; "...Failure of the #8 piston or the #8 rod or rod bearing in Ford 5.0L, V-8 gas engines. Solution: During engine installation, reroute the PCV valve vacuum supply hose. Follow these steps: Plug the 3/8" (pipe) thread hole in the rear of the plenum where the PCV valve hose is connected. Drill and tap a 3/8" pipe thread hole in the center of the plenum and thread the PCV connector into it. Reconnect the PCV valve vacuum supply hose to the new location. Be sure the drain hole in the baffle is open. The baffle is under the PCV location in the valve cover. Installers who have rerouted the PCV system and opened the baffle drain hole have not reported any #8 cylinder failures..."
Source: by fourstarengines.com via web.archive.org

"Positive Crankcase Ventilation (PCV) System
The positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) system cycles crankcase gases back through the engine (6007) where they are burned. The positive crankcase ventilation valve (PCV valve) (6A666) regulates the amount of ventilation air and blow-by fuel vapor to the intake manifold (9424) and prevents backfire from traveling into the crankcase. The positive crankcase ventilation valve is mounted in a vertical position."

CAUTION: Do not remove the PCV system from the engine. Operating engine without PCV system will reduce both fuel economy and engine ventilation. This will weaken engine performance and shorten life.
Typical PCV Air Flow Diagram

180171


ItemPart NumberDescription
16582Valve Cover
2To Air Cleaner Outlet Tube (9B659)
36758Crankcase Ventilation Tube
49E926Throttle Body
59424Intake Manifold
66A666Positive Crankcase Ventilation Valve
 
#5 ·
Hey guys,

I picked up a PCV catch can to install along with my new engine, and I just wanted to ask: is it worth it to actually have one? I’m just starting to doubt whether I want to install it or not.

Thoughts?
I installed a cheepy eBay can on my 351. I'm amazed how much junk it has caught. Worth it.
 
#8 ·
Worn rings and blow-by so bad the engine was pumping oil into the air filter, so I installed one of these from Moroso...
Image



(originally for an ‘87-‘93 mustang) BETWEEN the air filter and PCV fresh air intake. I was pulling ~4-6 oz. of oil out every time I got gas...
Image



When we swapped in the 347, replumbed the catch can back to its correct spot between the PCV valve and intake. Still pulls a fair amount, but this is what I’m pulling every 5K miles...
Image


I’m a fan.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
#7 ·
Empty when it gets half full. Never understood why they need a breather...

I have a home built one on my 85 and i built one thats on @BikerPepe` s 96. Mine is hooked to the bottom of the carb. Even on a freshly built engine, it works great.

Image


Nevermind this fitting pointing at the bracket lol, I made a change and moved it to the cap like in the first pic
Image
 
#11 ·
You honestly need 2 PCV cans. One on suction side and one on fresh air side. One on suction side for obvious reasons. The one on the fresh air side will keep the throttle body and intake clean. It will prevent coking of the throttle body especially if you are using the coolant heated TB.
My all time favorite is these but they are on the expensive side.

There is a valuable option: These appear identical to the Radium cans. Either they are clones or ones that Radium deemed rejects for cosmetic reasons. I know we have rejects sometimes for cosmetic reasons that we do not send to anodizers or that come back from anodizer that doesn't color correctly. I have oredered parts for these guys before and have had no issues.

I am going to repeat what I have posted before about PCV systems. Put the PCV valve in the front hole not the back. Accelerations forces oil to the back of the valve covers and you end up sucking oil rather than just the vapor you want. Fresh air goes in the rear air. USE a PCV valve because you will have to too much suction in high vacuum situation. It is a great vacuum regulator.
One of the best articles I have seen the explains the whole PCV system and application of catch cans.

 
#12 ·
I am going to repeat what I have posted before about PCV systems. Put the PCV valve in the front hole not the back. Accelerations forces oil to the back of the valve covers and you end up sucking oil rather than just the vapor you want.
That is simply genius! Never heard or read that.
 
#15 ·
My MAF intake duct has a line from the Y where the duct splits before the TB that goes down to the oil filler neck. My new engine doesn’t have a filler neck, so I put on a breather cap with a hose fitting on it to run up to the duct. I suppose I could cap it and swap the locations, but I need to think about how I want to do this.
 
#16 ·
When you use the 2nd catch for fresh air you can either plumb the inlet side ahead of the TB or Carb using the existing air filter or just put a filter on the catch can. Main thing you are trying to prevent is oil and oil vapors in the intake and TB. Most don't realize how much oil vapors get into the fresh air side to the TB. They happen after engine shutdown the hot gasses rise, cool, and puddle along the air intake track.

I like to see at least 3/8 inch so that it isn't restricted.
 
#21 ·
Let me make sure I understand, you are not installing an air/oil separator on the intake line to scrub ("catch") incoming PCV air, but to scrub only the back flow after engine shut down?

If that's the case, given these catch cans are directional, how are you orienting the inlet/outlet?
 
#18 ·
I assume this is to prevent a dead #8, right? looks like I have my next small project, good idea, dunno why I haven't done this on anything. along with switching it to the front.

still not sure on why a catch can on the intake side though? I am running a carbed motor, soon to be a sniper EFI setup. can you clarify some on that point?
 
#20 ·
I assume this is to prevent a dead #8, right?
For me, no, not really. For some, perhaps. On my 351 EFI intake, they brought the PCV hose around to the upper plenum to a second port near the main vacuum tree instead of on the back, near the #8 intake runner.

I’m actually doing this just to help prevent gunking up the intake with deposits. I figure the more I can prevent keeping that trash out of the intake and combustion chambers, the better. The PCV vacuum port on this intake is underneath the main chamber, to mix into all runners.
Image
 
#24 ·
Since everyone seems to like this idea, let me go into more detail. I will break it down into vacuum side and fresh air side. Also why you need both.
First off read and study this article. The diagrams will open to larger pics if you need to.


Ignore the section about the AOS (Air Oil Separator) it over complicates the project. What we are using is catch cans the separate out the oil differently.

What I will be discussing is the closed system, the diagram in the middle.
180211


The vacuum side is the blue lines, Fresh air is the tan lines. No bikini here. Those running a carb can imagine the carb in place of the throttle body.

ok here we go. Whew I need more coffee.

You want the PCV connection In the farthest forward port of the valve cover. The reason why, is that acceleration forces the oil to the back of the cover and you will suck a lot of that oil into the separator causing increased oil consumption and frequent emptying of the catch can. The valve doesn't need to be in the valve cover but at least somewhere in the system from the valve cover and the vacuum port. The other line will run from the catch can to some point after the throttle body or carb. Now that you have captured the oil and oil vapor you will not have a dirty intake or intake ports in the head. Yes on some intakes this will help solve the dead #8.

Oil and oil vapor in the intake reduces the octane rating which does result in pre ignition and reduced power. You may not be able to hear the pre ignition but it is happening. Now that you have eliminated the oil and vapor you may find you can now run more timing. Like 2 to 4 degrees more. You might even gain a mile or two in gas milage.

Yes you do need a PCV valve. It regulates the vacuum. At idle and cruise it limits the amount of vacuum in the PCV system. It will keep you from sucking too much out of the system. Eliminating increased oil consumption and frequent emptying catch can. During acceleration you have low vacuum so it opens wider to allow more flow. It is hard to tell in this pic but the blue part of the PCV valve is tapered.
180222


Ok let's get to the fresh air side of the system. You want a catch can on this side as well.. It IS NOT for filtering the air coming into the engine. Your engine air filter does that. When you shut down a hot engine you have hot oil vapor escaping the crankcase. If the PCV valve is working correctly it can't escape on that side, so it escapes on the fresh air side. As it cools the vapor condenses into a liquid. This liquid puddles in the section between the air cleaner and throttle body.

You carb guys aren't left out either. How many of you have removed the air cleaner lid and found oil puddled inside? This is where that comes from? Guess what happens when you start that engine. It gets sucked in the TB or carb and into the engine. NOT what we want. Remember we are trying to eliminate any oil or vapor reaching the engine.

You guys running a TB with coolant lines for preheating the air in cold conditions have another problem. That heating actually cooks the oil and turns it into carbon. How many of you removed the TB and seen it black inside or had a sticking throttle because of carbon buildup? Most say bypass the TB coolant lines. Yeah sure no more carbon deposits but that doesn't fix the problem. The problem is stopping that oil and vapor from coming from the engine after shut down. This is why you need the 2nd can.

For the question about reversing the connections on the fresh air side. In the system diagram above look at the top side of both cans. On the vacuum side air is flowing from the engine to the top of the can. On the fresh air side with the engine running, air flows from the engine air filter to the side of the can and out the top to the engine. On shut down the hot engine vapors enter the top, condense and fall into the can trapping the oil in the catch can keeping them from entering the air intake system. You want to connect both valve covers to the top of each catch can.

I like running valve cover breathers with a PCV valve built into them. I remove the valve on the fresh air one. It does mean that I have remove one of the breathers to add oil. I am trying to eliminate that by adding an oil filler neck on the fresh air side.

I am considering adding this filler neck to the fresh air side. It is easy to plumb and the fresh air connects to the side of the filler neck. It does mean it is close to the firewall and may make it harder to add oil. You could put it on the vacuum side if you can figure out how to add a PCV valve somewhere on the vacuum system.
Image


With the Radium or Racetronix catch cans they have -10AN O ring ports, you can use a Radium PCV valve mounted to side of the catch can, not the top. Pay attention to the arrow and the direction the air flows. You can get them barb for 3/8 hose or -6 AN.
Image
Image



I hope I haven't completely confused everyone. Pros of running this time of PCV system is it reduces oil consumption, prevents a dirty intake and intake track, improves engine performance by preventing oil and vapor from entering the engine. Cons are it involves more plumbing, take up more space, and requires occasional emptying of the catch cans.

I know I have talked mostly about Radium and Racetronix. What I am saying is not marketing hype but actual facts. There is no reason not to use the Moroso catch cans. I hate their term AOS. The term AOS comes from the early days when boosted guys ran pneumatic air oil separators before people like Moroso Radium and Racetronix started making them.

Any of these Moroso catch cans or their universal ones would be fine.
 
#26 ·
As @Hillbilly Heaven said about having 2 Catch cans 1 in the PCV valve line and 1 on the Fresh air side, he is correct that when the Engine is shut down some Crankcase fumes will make their way into the Throttle body then Intake manifold but the "Main" reason is for the Crankcase pressure under High load/Full throttle when the PCV valve is closed pushes all the Fumes into the Fresh air Intake side and it goes directly into the Throttle body and then the Intake manifold then right into the Cylinders. So the 2 Catch can would prevent this from happening and to answer your question @Want2BS8ed, the Inlet side always faces where the Oil and Fumes are coming from so the Outlet side always has the Cleaned air from the Catch can.
I learned a lot about this in the late 80's and early 90's with my involvement with Turbo Buicks and blowing oil out of the engine at all the weak points; Seals, Gaskets and wherever. The Turbo created so much positive pressure that I also use to install a Check valve in the PCV valve line to keep the Intake manifold boost pressure from over coming the PCV valve and leaking/blowing past it into the Crankcase creating excessive Crankcase pressure. I don't know if I ever shared this with anyone before back then but it definitely worked great and STOPPED all the Excessive Crankcase pressure which in turn STOPPED all the Multiple Oil leaks. It also stopped most of the oil getting into the Fresh air intake side.
In my previous post to this I questioned the need for a Filter on a Catch can well for the PCV valve side they are DEFINITLY NOT needed but for the 2nd Catch can in the Fresh air Intake side on a system where the Fresh air comes from a filter on the Valve cover or in other words an Open system then the Filter would DEFINITLY be NEEDED.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Want2BS8ed
#28 ·
My intake was super nasty, I thought about changing the intake PCV to an exhaust Crankcase evac system. Just need to drill a hole downstream and angle it in, comes with a check valve in case you have a backfire or anything.

Image



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#32 ·
@Hillbilly Heaven and @Stevo440, thanks for the explanations. Slow on the uptake, but the pieces are fitting together now.

Bringing up the oily PCV filter in the filter box (and why @Steve440) was the ah-ha moment for me.

Who knew when I originally installed the can to solve my blow by problem that I was actually doing something right!!

Fortunately, there is plenty of room on the other side of the Moroso bracket to mount a second unit.

Again, appreciate your taking the time to dumb the conversation down to the lowest denominator... me!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hillbilly Heaven
#33 ·
I haven’t posted any questions or topics before but just started contributing a couple of comments recently in other threads. However, I’ve read FSB extensively since we bought our Bronco in 2017.

This post was really an eye opener. I always noticed the heavy oil/grease buildup from the PCV hose but I just accepted it and kept cleaning everything down stream.

After looking into the broad price range of PCV catch cans, is there a difference in performance between ones that have a low micron filter versus the designs using stainless steel filtration media?

And the prices vary widely, from around $20 to well over $300. My 1989 Bronco 5.0L EFI is a semi-daily driver and occasional fishing and skiing trips, not heavy off road activities.

Some brands, like Moroso, also state that they are “Not legal for sale or use on pollution-controlled vehicles.” I’m in California and have to satisfy smog restrictions so that brand is not an option.

I know many times the members have stressed “You get what you pay for” but does the PCV catch can solution fall under this warning too? I’m very conscious of it when buying and installing mechanical and electrical parts.

So my question is about the media filtration system on the cans. Both the same relative performance? Or is one better than the other?
 
#34 ·
I haven’t posted any questions or topics before but just started contributing a couple of comments recently in other threads. However, I’ve read FSB extensively since we bought our Bronco in 2017.

This post was really an eye opener. I always noticed the heavy oil/grease buildup from the PCV hose but I just accepted it and kept cleaning everything down stream.

After looking into the broad price range of PCV catch cans, is there a difference in performance between ones that have a low micron filter versus the designs using stainless steel filtration media?

And the prices vary widely, from around $20 to well over $300. My 1989 Bronco 5.0L EFI is a semi-daily driver and occasional fishing and skiing trips, not heavy off road activities.

Some brands, like Moroso, also state that they are “Not legal for sale or use on pollution-controlled vehicles.” I’m in California and have to satisfy smog restrictions so that brand is not an option.

I know many times the members have stressed “You get what you pay for” but does the PCV catch can solution fall under this warning too? I’m very conscious of it when buying and installing mechanical and electrical parts.

So my question is about the media filtration system on the cans. Both the same relative performance? Or is one better than the other?
The catch can's purpose is not to filter the oil out, but rather separate it from the air and keep it separated.

I used a stainless steel wool scrubby from the kitchen cleaning department in mine.
 
#35 ·
Spent some time reading through this thread and I definitely learned a lot about the importance of the PCV system and the catch can. Anyway, last week I had to pull my upper intake. My Bronco doesn't get driven a whole lot (which I need to do a better job of) so there was quite a bit of build up in the intake. When I flipped the intake over to clean it, a good bit of oil poured out of one of the runners. My PCV system comes off the rear of the passenger side valve cover and then into an elbow where it then goes around an up into one of the ports at the center of the intake. I'm thinking I'd benefit from putting a catch can in line somewhere, but curious where the best location would be. Thanks.
 
#36 ·
It depends.

Very limited use (and carbed, which is less sensitive to throttle plate particle accumulation), I don't bother with one.
High performance naturally aspirated, will use one can somewhere in line with PCV.
Forced induction, I eliminate PCV valve all together (and basically the stock type routing of PCV system).
I gut PCV and run two more lines off each valve cover. Gutted PCV line goes to first catch can, vavle cover
lines go to second catch can. Outlet of both cans goes to ground. For these usually limited use engines, I change oil
more often due to loss of PCV scavenging. I've had too many seals blown out, on engines not originally designed for boost.
(much easier to change oil more often, than to have to redo a rear main seal).
 
#37 ·
@jermil01 Keep PCV valve, add hose which goes from valve cover PCV to catch can, then back to intake. Basically you want to interupt the current PCV system with a catch can. Though if you get too crazy on the lengths you can get into a situation where it will not run hot enough to get rid of the condensate (Likely less of an issue since your in Florida) very real issue up Here where I am at

All the info in this thread is good stuff. If you have never used a catch can, you will likely be shocked how much they collect in the typical 3-5k mile oil change interval. If you use vehicle for TOW duty or hard use I would check/drain them more often
 
#38 ·
Thanks @CrazyBRONCOguy, that's what I was planning to do, then I watched this video and the guy installed one inline from the next of the oil filler to the air intake hose. I know @Hillbilly Heaven said it wasn't a bad idea to have two. If I were going to start with one, seems it would make sense to go with the one from the PCV to the intake.

 
#40 ·
My buddy Steevee

Been following him for a while.

I put one on my 1996. It makes me feel better about myself .... I haven't actually gotten any oil yet ..... but who really cares.

I would think any kind of boost would definitely require one ... or if your tired engine is letting oil by the rings ... but my 1996 is as tight as a drum.

I think the TB buildup is more from years and years of tiny little amounts of oil vapor .... not actual aerosol oil droplets getting past.

It's not like it is hurting anything.
 
#42 ·
@jermil01 Agree that best to have 2, I'd do the PCV side first, like you said thou. From my experience on a helthy engine the "fresh air side" shouldn't get hardly any in it. I have 2 on most of my toys and don't ever have more then a small mist inside the non PCV side.

Agree with @Want2BS8ed on the answers above. Tho will add if your staying with 5.0/5.8 you can get catch cans that will work easy enough with future engine. I look at these as a maintenance item, along the same lines as adding an external trans filter, or cooler.